{"id":776,"date":"2017-02-22T20:53:08","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T20:53:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/christianity666.com\/?p=776"},"modified":"2026-04-30T02:25:40","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T02:25:40","slug":"making-milo-a-recipe-for-abuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/christianity666.com\/?p=776","title":{"rendered":"Making Milo: A recipe for Abuse."},"content":{"rendered":"

Making Milo: A recipe for Abuse.<\/p>\n

Ingredients:<\/p>\n

1 Catholic priest,
\n1 young boy,
\n1 parish congregation,
\n1 Catholic Bishop,<\/p>\n

Method:<\/p>\n

Mix: 1x Catholic priest and the 1x young boy by leaving them alone together, in privacy.
\nCover: with a parish congregation who ignore the homosexual priest in their midst thinking it will harm the church to identify him.
\nGarnish: with 1x local Bishop in denial who facilitates priests movements around the world.<\/p>\n

The first recorded case in New Zealand occurred before 1900.
\n<\/a>Catholic priests who abused New Zealand children will not be investigated.<\/a>
\nCost to American Parishes (as at 2002): over US$572M<\/a><\/p>\n

It is interesting to note that Milo\u2019s attitude to youth sex was exactly mirrored by the Catholic Nuns teaching theology to future Anglican priests at the University of Auckland School of Theology when the subject turned to women\u2019s rights to chose what is good for them without patriarchal influence.
\n—<\/p>\n

Milo, CPAC, Homosexuality, and Pedophilia<\/a><\/h1>\n

Milo has provided a window into a disturbing aspect of gay culture.<\/h4>\n

By Michael Brown<\/a> Published on\u00a0February 20, 2017 \u2022
\n\"milo\"<\/p>\n

Conservative gay activist Milo Yiannopoulos is surrounded by controversy yet again, first because he was invited by the conservative giant CPAC to keynote their next conference, then because he was dropped<\/a> after critics posted several audio clips in which he apparently endorsed pedophilia, and now because of his statement<\/a> strongly denouncing pedophilia, speaking as a child abuse victim himself. What are we to make of all this?<\/p>\n

What to Make of Milo<\/h4>\n

First, it was an error for CPAC to invite Milo to keynote, despite his rhetorical brilliance and his ability to dismantle and expose today\u2019s ridiculous PC extremes.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s one thing for Milo to speak on college campuses and other settings, where he can also be himself, including using his full range of profanity, vulgarity, and gay flaunting. It\u2019s another thing for CPAC to celebrate an out and proud homosexual as one of its champions (after all, that\u2019s part of being a keynote speaker at a conference of this kind; you are invited because of your leadership and your voice).<\/p>\n

I gladly interviewed<\/a> Milo on my radio show and would gladly do so again, but I would not invite him to be the graduation speaker at my organization\u2019s school of ministry. And while CPAC is a political organization rather than a religious one, if it fails to hold the line on gay activism, it will cease to be truly conservative.<\/p>\n

Second, while denouncing pedophilia (which is something every gay man I have ever talked to about this has done, without equivocation), Milo drew attention to the fact that many older gay men are involved with much younger gay men (commonly called \u201cboys,\u201d according to Milo), a practice defended<\/a> in 2013 by the influential gay journalist Michelangelo Signorile, who noted that, \u201cHistorically, gay men have engaged in intergenerational sexual encounters, brief romances and long-term relationships \u2014 among consenting adults \u2014 probably much more than straight people have.\u201d<\/p>\n

And although Milo alleges that these aforementioned \u201cboys\u201d are all of the age of consent, it is no secret that gay activists have often been at the forefront of pushing for the lowering of the age of consent. (For a 2010 example from England, see here<\/a>.) It is also no secret that gay literature through the centuries has celebrated the \u201clove\u201d of grown men and boys, and in these cases, there is no doubt that they were minors rather than young men.<\/p>\n

8 Principal Arguments to Defend \u201cMan-Boy Love\u201d<\/h4>\n

As I demonstrated in painstaking detail in A Queer Thing Happened to America<\/a><\/em>, the identical arguments that have been used by gay activists to defend homosexuality have also been used by advocates of so-called \u201cman-boy love\u201d (or, in its sanitized form, \u201cintergenerational intimacy\u201d).<\/p>\n

The 8 principal arguments I listed were:<\/p>\n