Christians: Trans is never OK

Trans is never OK

Christians, being “trans” is never OK. Transsexuals are not “OK” with God. Claiming anyone can change gender is not OK with God. Not even in the privacy of one’s own home. And anyone saying they support those who claim they or anyone can change their gender is never “OK” with God.

Trans is never OK

This seems a strange thing to say to those who claim their religion is “Bible based”, but it still needs to be said. I can’t think of anything worse than hearing a preacher or Christian politician say “I don’t mind what you do in your own home” so they are liked more by their audience, or need the money or votes. Or maybe because they just don’t care.

But seriously, it’s not OK with God for people to claim that others can change their sexual identity, and especially not through surgery or drugs.

I can’t think of any preachers or wannabe politicians who claim “rape is OK as long as it’s done in private,” or “child abuse is OK  as long as it’s done in private”.

And yet many Christians seem to make the statement that being trans (or any other sexual deviancy, sodomy, etc) is “OK as long as it’s done in private/their own home/ bedroom”.

Being trans isn’t OK with Jesus!

Most I’ve met, or have  worked or lived with, have been abused, groomed, rejected or neglected . Those things are never OK and shouldn’t be what someone forms an identity around.

Christians should instead be seeking to deal with the issues that underlie the self hatred:

Abuse: verbal, physical or sexual is never OK
Grooming or indoctrination by parents, predators or teachers is never OK.
Rejection hurts, but shouldn’t lead to self hatred.
Neglect or abandonment shouldn’t lead to self hatred either.

And often it’s a combination of issues, so Christians; being trans is never OK.

When they’re screaming out telling you their new gender, it’s a sign of the hurt underneath.

Christians should be helping their recovery from the above underlying issues, not telling these people that the cause of their distress is that they’re in the wrong body, or that their deviant behaviour is OK, just as long as they hide it from us.

God made us in his own image, male and female,. God knew us before we were born, and we were created to be holy, sacred, to be partakers of his own divine nature.  And it’s never too late to start that journey.

Here’s why feminists can’t fix their rainbow.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

Considering it was NZ’s academic feminism that birthed our nations political, corporate, and social acceptance of these rainbow babies, it’s not surprising these same feminists now want to dis-own or abort their own child.  Aborting children is now solidly part of NZ’s feminist-led culture! These are the women that spent decades trying to get girls into boy scouts, boy schools and boys spaces.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

The old style feminists were out in force supporting Auckland trans movement. The grey haired woman in pink sleeveless top with the rainbow earrings was bashing a gong to help create the violence. This is a screenshot from in the video below. You see many more in the video below in their rainbow gear.

Feminists claim men have all power.  Men are toxic. Feminists want equality (equality means to replace men as being in control of society). Feminists still want total unrestrained freedom to be and do and experience whatever they please. First wave, second wave, third wave, fourth wave feminism. But they needed allies. They knew not all women wanted what they wanted, and they knew they couldn’t get what they wanted without getting men on their side.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

Another old style feminists with a gong celebrating her mehem with the trans who liked to show his knickers to everyone.

As part of sex-ed, from Age 5 children in NZ schools are encouraged to:  challenge homophobia, transphobia, sexism, and gender-based violence, interrogate the ongoing effects of colonisation, study the environmental impacts of changes in population growth and of related issues such as people’s use and disposal of menstrual products, … and gain understandings about the strengths of sexual and gender diversity.

Essentially, here in NZ, children are sexualised as soon as they get to school .

Auckland won't let women speak

Not all women are feminists. While not all feminists will admit to hating men themselves, they identify with the power and authority that being a feminist gives them over other women. They hate the society they claim men have created. So here’s why feminists can’t fix their rainbow.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

Gay men called in by the pride community leaders were out with their whistles, supported by the old style feminists with gongs in the back ground.

But firstly, we do need to acknowledge that glbt men are being beaten up in bathrooms for just being themselves. This is what they are afraid of. they are afraid of getting beaten up in mens bathrooms. There can be less of this if they don’t try and hit on straight guys when they go into the toilets. Also stop offering to pay for sex in public toilets. Stop asking actual men questions to try and ‘break the ice’ before you ask for sex. Stop complimenting men on their    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  or _ _ _ _ _ _  .  Stop touching straight men in bathrooms. That touch on the arm that women do, don’t do it. And don’t fish for compliments from straight men. You’re not beautiful, you look like a circus clown. We don’t like the way you look.

While all of the above behaviour glbt men claim may be ‘being yourselves’, and since so much of the violence is trans on trans, maybe stop trying to pick up anyone in public toilets. All these simple things will keep glbts safer in men’s spaces.

Feminist psychoticism was on full display!

feminists can't fix their rainbow

And secondly, we need to acknowledge that we understand where the anger comes from. The trans’s have been lied to, putting on a dress and make up doesn’t make anyone a woman. Having surgeries and and taking medications so now you can no longer give pleasure to anyone of any sex without toys, and not being able to orgasm in any gender must be devastating. We totally understand that, and we’d be disappointed too if we’d thought turning a penis inside out would replicate an actual vagina, with all the fluids, aromas, heat, muscle movements etc.  We’d be angry. Very angry. At ourselves, and at society. So we understand where this anger comes from.

And that’ collective anger is what we witnessed here:

Who organised the Let Women Speak event?

This event was organised by old school feminist womens, lesbian and gay rights type Labour Party supporters. One women even told Sean Plunket she was a life time Labour party supporter. These are the 1960’s and 70’s university grads type women that have been in control of the institutions here in NZ for decades since.

A typical women who turned up to support Posie Parker would call themselves a supporters of the glbt community. But by multitudes of hundreds, the majority of women were against Posie Parker speaking.

A typical graduate of our education system is this New Zealand minister of parliament.

Study: ‘Transgender’ Youth at Highest Risk for Violent Radicalization

Study: Transvestites are more at risk of violence from their own

The reason why there has been no outrage from either media or parliament at these comments is because it is normal New Zealand education from primary school upwards.

With decades of hatred against men, from primary schools to universities to workplaces, these same women are now asking where their male support for standing up for women’s rights is! Our Prime Minister doesn’t even know what a woman is!

With 3 MP’s there, all with the same education, how could the result be any different?

Golriz ready to fight nazi's

Who organised the “counter protest”?

Auckland Pride (LGBT), Unite Union, Tamaki Antifa, Labour Party, Green Party, NZ Police.

Boycott unitefeminists can't fix their rainbow.

Unite Union, Tamaki Antifa, Labour Party and Green Party were the same groups counter protesting against free speech outside the town hall in 2018 when the Canadian speakers were banned from the town hall. They were able to control the media by claiming we were all nazi’s, and nothing was mentioned about the actual original issue we originally had: the government and media cover up of child sexual abuse.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

The feminists are asking “where were the men?”

Traditional men have been shut out of public square. They have been kicked out of homes by the family court. Many of today’s kids have not had fathers at home, women simply have more money and more independence without men around.  Traditional men would keep away from the man hating feminist lesbian organisers and any message they had. Men are sick of the conflict that feminists create.

Any time men speak out against the onslaught of feminism in the workplace or anywhere else, they are shut down and called woman haters. If men object to feminism, women say it means they hate women. Men tire from this, and to keep away from this conflict and dramas with women because they are always to blame.

Why do people what to change genders in these ways anyway?

Why do they hate their own gender? They’re taught to by our feminist driven education system and media claiming that men have all power, all evil comes from men, masculinity is toxic.  Men are toxic. Why do they want to change? They’re taught changing genders will solve their problems. So who’s teaching them these things?

And this bring us to why feminists can’t fix their rainbow offspring: Simply because New Zealand’s current glbt juggernaut is the their own creation from the women’s studies departments. They’ll never admit they were wrong about their claims in all the same educational and political and business circles they’ve taken authority over.

Some feminists will deny the creation of the academic man/male/patriarchy hating that NZ academia has become is their work at all,. Instead they will point to some rich wealthy foreigner for paying them to spread the toxic masculinity mantra for decades. Feminists have started damage control already this week trying to find the financial sources of those promoting the ‘trans’ movement.

After taking over the universities, the feminists aimed for the churches and took them over also. Once the feminists had control of churches they encouraged their trans allies in also. As a result, the Anglican church has gone from being 35% of the population in the 1960’s to just 6% of NZ in 2018.

It’s never occurred to these feminists that they didn’t have to accept the money offered to them to promote the agenda. It never occurred to them that they didn’t have to teach the kids to hate men.

But the success of the trans movement in gaining momentum was built on generations of young kids hearing the toxic masculinity chants in classrooms and media and in homes throughout the country.

This is so institutionalised, they win the national person of the year award.

And here is below (top right) celebrating after Posie Parker left the stage:

feminists can't fix their rainbow

What’s going to happen?

This will take a couple of decades to disappear once the universities take out the current anti-men aspect from the curriculum. It’s taken several generations to get this bad, and it will take several more to undo.

But women won’t want to give up their power in academia, it means they’re wrong, and no feminist will ever admit they were wrong.

Ironically, the women who have re-written men to be evil in NZ history are now having their own writing burnt by their rainbow spawn.

Feminists can’t fix their rainbow. Formerly the woman’s studies department, is now Gender Studies on the UoA website:

Bachelor of Arts – BA

Note: Gender Studies includes the following courses taught by other faculties: EDUC 714 Gender, Sexuality and Education; POPLHLTH 769 Interpersonal and Family Violence; PSYCH 319 Psychology and Gender; PSYCH 755 Gender, Power and Sexuality; SOCCHFAM 700 Domestic Violence: Challenges and Responses; SOCHLTH 756 Special Topic.

For descriptions of these courses and their availability, please consult Student Services Online.

Gender Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
GENDER 101 Gender: Global and Local Semester 1
GENDER 208 Thinking Gender Semester 1
GENDER 306 Making Waves: Gender and Change Semester 2
Classical Studies and Ancient History


Course Title Available in 2023
ANCIENT 216 Sex and Power in Greece and Rome Semester 2
ANCIENT 316 Sex and Power in Greece and Rome Semester 2
Anthropology


Course Title Available in 2023
ANTHRO 106 Global Sound Cultures: Musics, Places and People Semester 2
ANTHRO 357 Gender, Sexuality and Popular Music Semester 2
Asian Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
ASIAN 200 Asian Identities Semester 2
ASIAN 303 Asian Identities Semester 2
Criminology


Course Title Available in 2023
CRIM 303 Gender, Crime and Justice Semester 2
English


Course Title Available in 2023
ENGLISH 102 Great Books: Seduction and Betrayal Semester 2
Philosophy


Course Title Available in 2023
PHIL 225 Power, Critique and Emancipation Semester 1
PHIL 345 Power, Critique and Emancipation Semester 1
Politics and International Relations


Course Title Available in 2023
POLITICS 109 Foundations of Western Politics and Law Semester 2
Sociology


Course Title Available in 2023
SOCIOL 200 Theory and Society Semester 1
SOCIOL 207 Sociology of Gender and Families Semester 1
SOCIOL 315 Law, Inequality and the State Semester 2
SOCIOL 322 A Sociology of Relational Life Semester 2

Bachelor of Arts (Honours) – BA(Hons)

Note: Gender Studies includes the following courses taught by other faculties: EDUC 714 Gender, Sexuality and Education; POPLHLTH 769 Interpersonal and Family Violence; PSYCH 319 Psychology and Gender; PSYCH 755 Gender, Power and Sexuality; SOCCHFAM 700 Domestic Violence: Challenges and Responses; SOCHLTH 756 Special Topic.

For descriptions of these courses and their availability, please consult Student Services Online.

Gender Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
GENDER 700 Critical Theories and Methods in Gender Studies Semester 1
GENDER 701/701AB Special Study Semester 1, or Semester 2, or Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
GENDER 780/780AB Research Project Semester 1, or Semester 2, or Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
GENDER 785/785A Dissertation Semester 1, or Semester 2, or Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Development Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
DEVELOP 702 Gender and Development Semester 1
History


Course Title Available in 2023
HISTORY 706AB Topics in European Cultural History Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Sociology


Course Title Available in 2023
SOCIOL 735 Current Debates in Gender and Sexuality Semester 2

Master of Arts – MA

Note: Gender Studies includes the following courses taught by other faculties: EDUC 714 Gender, Sexuality and Education; POPLHLTH 769 Interpersonal and Family Violence; PSYCH 319 Psychology and Gender; PSYCH 755 Gender, Power and Sexuality; SOCCHFAM 700 Domestic Violence: Challenges and Responses; SOCHLTH 756 Special Topic.

For descriptions of these courses and their availability, please consult Student Services Online.

Gender Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
GENDER 793 Dissertation Semester 1
GENDER 797AAB Research Portfolio Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Development Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
DEVELOP 702 Gender and Development Semester 1
History


Course Title Available in 2023
HISTORY 706AB Topics in European Cultural History Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Sociology


Course Title Available in 2023
SOCIOL 735 Current Debates in Gender and Sexuality Semester 2

Bachelor of Arts – BA

Gender Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
GENDER 202 Gender in the Pacific Not taught in 2023
GENDER 206 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 207 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 300 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 301 Gender, Sex and Commodification Not taught in 2023
GENDER 307 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
Anthropology


Course Title Not taught 2023
ANTHRO 241 Anthropology of the Body Not taught in 2023
ANTHRO 354 Anthropology of the Body Not taught in 2023
ANTHRO 358 Gender and Colonialism in the Pacific Not taught in 2023
Art History


Course Title Not taught 2023
ARTHIST 233 The Art of Gender Politics Not taught in 2023
ARTHIST 333 The Art of Gender Politics Not taught in 2023
Communication


Course Title Not taught 2023
COMMS 304 Gender, Politics and the Media Not taught in 2023
Comparative Literature


Course Title Not taught 2023
COMPLIT 202 Interpreting Folktales Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
COMPLIT 303 Interpreting Folktales Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
English


Course Title Not taught 2023
ENGLISH 346 African and Caribbean Literature Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 354 Writing Selves Not taught in 2023
German


Course Title Not taught 2023
GERMAN 230 German Cinema from Murnau to Riefenstahl Not taught in 2023
History


Course Title Not taught 2023
HISTORY 241 Making Sense of the Sixties: the USA 1954-1974 Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 256 Sex and Gender in the Middle Millennium (500-1500CE) Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 326 Sex and Gender in the Middle Millennium (500-1500CE) Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 341 Making Sense of the Sixties: the USA 1954-1974 Not taught in 2023
Italian


Course Title Not taught 2023
ITALIAN 203 Engendered Voices (Texts in English) Not taught in 2023
Pacific Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
PACIFIC 208 Gender and the Pacific in a Globalising World Not taught in 2023
PACIFIC 307 Gender and the Pacific in a Globalising World Not taught in 2023
Sociology


Course Title Not taught 2023
SOCIOL 326 Sociology of Violence and Death Not taught in 2023
Theological and Religious Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
THEOREL 211 Religion, Gender and Sexuality Not taught in 2023
THEOREL 311 Religion, Gender and Sexuality Not taught in 2023

Bachelor of Arts (Honours) – BA(Hons)

Gender Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
GENDER 705 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 706 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
Drama


Course Title Not taught 2023
DRAMA 708 Drama and the Mind Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
English


Course Title Not taught 2023
ENGLISH 702 Postcolonial Literary Studies Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 709 Theatre on Screen Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 731 Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte Not taught in 2023
French


Course Title Not taught 2023
FRENCH 729 Gender and Culture: Perspectives from the French-speaking World Not taught in 2023
History


Course Title Not taught 2023
HISTORY 707AB Early Modern Japanese Lives Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 725AB Health, Medicine and Society Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
HISTORY 736AB Medieval Women, c.1100-1500 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Media and Communication


Course Title Not taught 2023
MEDIA 711 Feminist Film Theory Not taught in 2023
Philosophy


Course Title Not taught 2023
PHIL 740 Metaphysics 1 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Politics and International Relations


Course Title Not taught 2023
POLITICS 724 Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism Not taught in 2023
Sociology


Course Title Not taught 2023
SOCIOL 700 Advanced Problems in Sociological Theory Not taught in 2023
SOCIOL 728 Family, Gender and the State Not taught in 2023
Spanish


Course Title Not taught 2023
SPANISH 722 Gender Perspectives in Hispanic Literature Not taught in 2023
SPANISH 738 Engendering Nations Not taught in 2023

Master of Arts – MA

Drama


Course Title Not taught 2023
DRAMA 708 Drama and the Mind Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
English


Course Title Not taught 2023
ENGLISH 702 Postcolonial Literary Studies Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 731 Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte Not taught in 2023
French


Course Title Not taught 2023
FRENCH 729 Gender and Culture: Perspectives from the French-speaking World Not taught in 2023
History


Course Title Not taught 2023
HISTORY 707AB Early Modern Japanese Lives Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 725AB Health, Medicine and Society Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
HISTORY 736AB Medieval Women, c.1100-1500 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Media and Communication


Course Title Not taught 2023
MEDIA 711 Feminist Film Theory Not taught in 2023
Philosophy


Course Title Not taught 2023
PHIL 740 Metaphysics 1 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Politics and International Relations


Course Title Not taught 2023
POLITICS 707 Politics of Global Protest: Dissent, Resistance and Power Not taught in 2023
POLITICS 724 Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism Not taught in 2023
Sociology


Course Title Not taught 2023
SOCIOL 700 Advanced Problems in Sociological Theory Not taught in 2023
SOCIOL 728 Family, Gender and the State Not taught in 2023
Spanish


Course Title Not taught 2023
SPANISH 722 Gender Perspectives in Hispanic Literature Not taught in 2023
SPANISH 738 Engendering Nations Not taught in 2023

Auckland won’t Let Women Speak

Auckland won't Let Women Speak phuc

It’s official: The feminists have won. For decades feminist academics and feminist religious leaders have pushed for the creation and acceptance of the trans community here in NZ. Now, with the help of the trade unions (eg UNITE, who were out in force with flags and their vans) Auckland won’t Let Women Speak.

That wasn’t trans free speech, that was trans free violence, only only a medicated person cannot tell the difference.

But there is a reason why trans are upset. Lupron is the drug we prescribe children from 9 years old here in New Zealand as a ‘puberty blocker.’ It is also used across the world to chemically castrate SEX offenders. Do parents have any idea what they are actually giving their child? Lupron has been through huge lawsuits over the last decade. Your ‘trans’ child has an 80% chance of growing out of their gender dysmorphia by 18. They often end up simply being Lesbian or Gay. Rather than letting your child develop into these choices you are chemically castrating them so as adults they will never experience pleasure. This is beyond sickening and my heart breaks for the children who are being indoctrinated into choices they cannot possibly understand. Adults – do whatever you like. But we need to stop accepting the castration of children.

Auckland won't let women speak
*his underwear – that man wants to share a bathroom with your little girl.

The trans man in pink above was the one who threw tomato sauce/soup on Posie Parker.

The security footage of Posie Parker shows she had something held at her neck, possibly scissors or a phone gimble.

This is what all those women preaching have been wanting – for trans to have their own voice in this world. Well, the trans voice says women cannot have their own spaces!

The feminists have won. Feminists claim men should no longer be heard, and they wanted equality. This is what they have worked for. The trans community in Auckland won’t Let Women Speak

Perhaps even more worrying were the number of men wanting men to have access to women’s toilets!

Auckland won't Let Women Speak phuc

Today’s violence against women was officially sanction by the NZ Government whose members of Parliament were there to supervise:

Marama Davidson NZ Member of Parliament – minister of prevention of violence was present today, and sanctioned the violence against women because it’s men’s fault. This is part of the reason why so many Maori men are in jail – because their women cannot simply think straight.

Other NZ politicians were ready for physical confrontation today, yet they support the nazi’s in Ukraine? Only feminist logic understand that!

Golriz ready to fight nazi's

New Zealand police were never going to help biological women in a space like this.

This from the Daily Telegraph:

Posie Parker – ‘All we’re saying to men is stay out of our spaces’

Women’s Rights activist Posie Parker is due to open the New Zealand leg of her world tour today, with an event in Albert Park Auckland this morning at 10.30am.

In a YouTube video she explained how a number of companies had cancelled their services at the last minute, at huge additional cost to her – sound system and security were two examples. ‘You have to find someone at the last minute, they understand your desperation and the prices go up.’

The security alone was going to cost $10,000, she said. ‘A company in Wellington refused, just won’t protect us. And this is because we’ve been really badly defamed and most people really hate women. But ten thousand is just ridiculous right?’

‘We know what biological sex is. We know what risks men pose to us. We know what their motivations are more often than not. Other men know their motivations. And unless you hate women and couldn’t care less about the safety of children, I don’t really understand how you can go along with this cult.’

‘They just prove our point. Every time they come on my thread or follow me on Twitter, or say something on Twitter like ‘go home’, ‘shut up’, ‘stay silent’, ‘f** off’, they just prove our point. Because we’re not saying that. All we’re saying to men is ‘stay out of our spaces.’

auckland won't let women speak

Auckland won't Let Women Speak

Auckland won't Let Women Speak

Today’s protest was organised by UNITE trade union, who had their team and van on site, then moved down to turn the family values march to a trans issue.
Boycott Unite Union businesses, women are not safe in their toilets! It is staff members from these businesses who created a living hell and are celebrating today.

Boycott unite

 Boycott unite

Women are not safe is these company toilets!

If biological women boycotted these businesses, the trans movement  in NZ would be zero.

love has no genders Auckland won't let women speak

Religious academics KNOW they target Children with the LGBT message!

From the Church of England’s refusal to discipline William Yate when he was banished from Northland almost two centuries ago, until today, the churches have long been responsible for covering up those abusing children here in NZ. These same religious leaders are now openly targeting the sexualisation of Children into special communities with the LGBTQI++etc philosophy (that sex with anyone is ok because they claim our evolution from animals means that it’s only natural to follow our carnal instincts).

As lauded feminist lecturer Helen Bergin (Catholic Institute of Theology) claimed in her Auckland University School of Theology classes, “…life would be so boring if there were only two genders”. It was her desire that children be given opportunities at a young age to experiment sexually so they can chose their new gender. It was from these classes that Eugene Sisneros graduated while at St Matthews, only to take the Anglican Church to the Human Rights commission to normalise his behaviour as a role model for Anglican children. St Matthews recently held the thanksgiving service for the 2018 Pride Festival.

There needs to be a Royal Commission of Inquiry into NZ religious organisation’s child sexual abuse, modelled after the recent Australian one.

Loosing our Religion? or is it being stolen from us?

It’s now common knowledge, and has been for some time, that Christianity is on the decline in New Zealand. But why? In a recent article, Losing our religion: Kiwis losing the faith in record numbers, Professor Peter Lineham attributes the loss to a diminishing middle class society.

So what’s behind the decline?

Massey University professor Peter Lineham has studied religious history in New Zealand for decades, and says today’s society does not value religious commitment, as our free time and financial circumstances have changed.

“Historically, religion flourished among what we would call middle income people, the middle classes. Now today, that’s the area of tremendous decline in religiosity.”

This seems to imply that it is forces from outside of the church, our financial and leisure commitments, that have caused this lack of faith. Having just completed five years of religious education in this country, I propose an alternative theory. I propose that the rot has originated from within the Church, rather than from without. Here is why.

For four years I studied at the School of Theology based at University of Auckland. Lectures were provided by some of New Zealand’s most influential academics who were a mix of Catholic nuns and priests, Anglican priests, Presbyterian and Methodist ministers, and others including a self confessed “lapsed Catholic”. The staff were sourced from the Catholic Institute of Theology. The students included a range or laypeople and potential ministers from the various denominations, and were predominantly Anglican, including Eugene Sisneros.

This School of Theology was promoted, when I visited before I enrolled, as being “scientific” in the academic sense, and not into the hocus of former generations. What I expected from this description was that we would have access to the latest in archaeological discoveries, verifying, or not, the biblical text. After all, surely Christianity is based on historical fact. And that we would investigate each moral issue from every different perspective.

Different perspectives were presented, but not as I had anticipated, from each angle. It was in the presentation of these differing perspectives that I contend that Christianity is being stolen from New Zealanders. Biblical history and theology was presented from the Enlightenment perspective, that it was something created at a much later date because writing wasn’t known back then. With the Bible out of the way, the feminist theologians were trying to ban patriarchal structures such as the family and church so they can justify uninhibited sexual freedoms for women. We were descended from animals, it was only natural for women to be free sexually. God created us that way. Children grow up perfectly fine without fathers. The church was evil for it’s suppression of women. Men were evil. Men were not allowed to question in class. I wanted to point out that animals exist in a pure form of rape-culture. Homosexual theologians were trying to legitimise their sexual preferences and ordination, while suppressing the damage homosexuals have created within society and hiding the abuse. I could not question their logic or reasoning, I was straight. They had science on their side. The self termed queer theologians were likewise trying to legitimise their sexual escapades, because if it is good enough for everyone else to behave like they want, it is good enough for them also. Then there were the liberation theologians, non-whites who could blame white man Christianity on all of their woes, and join forces with the eco-theologians and were due large financial payouts so that they could travel the world promoting global warming.

And there was a category of theologians, who haven’t yet named themselves,  drawn from all of the above categories, that I will name Paedo-Theologians.

Paedo-Theologians are those religious academics who promote the idea that children should be sexualised, by the state, in state run schools, at an early age, so that they can experiment and chose a gender, and be trained up, by the state, as to how that gender behaves.  

And yes, we have them amongst New Zealand Christian academics. Children should be free to chose their sexuality, and the earlier they are identified the sooner they can be started on whatever medications/ drugs they need to help them transition. It’s wrong for men to try and tell their daughters how to behave. It’s natural for women to want to have sex early, men couldn’t possibly know what it’s like to be a woman. All of these statements, and more, came from our classes.

All of these Theologians had the common denominator of an Enlightenment view of Biblical history. There was no exodus, no David or Solomon, no literal virgin birth, no literal resurrection, no actual miracles. Jesus didn’t really say those things. Paul didn’t write that. All you need to do is love.

In the fourth year we learn Karl Marx was the way, the truth and the light. So that all that is necessary for the Church to do is preform Social Justice, and try and over throw the Patriarchy to make everyone in society totally equal and then life would be fair.

This is the way the truth and the life. All to be administered by the world-wide council of churches and enforced by the UN. All religion is the same anyway, so we are taught.

If you objected to any of this, you were intolerant, a bigot, a fascist misogynistic homophobe.  All you need is love.

So this has been the training Anglican, and other, priests and laypeople for the last 15 years. Students graduating from this institution are now teaching Christianity throughout the Pacific.

This education is what I term cultural Marxism. I’ll define Marxism as pitting the economically poor (oppressed) against the wealthy elites (oppressors). After a revolution, everyone becomes equally poor. The only winners are those at the very top who manage the system. They get remembered in the hallowed halls of Academia. This is their glory, this is their fame. Cultural Marxism aims to achieve the same levelling with culture; family, race, religion, gender. Wives are the oppressed, husbands the oppressors, women are oppressed, men the oppressors, blacks are oppressed, whites the oppressors, homosexuals are the oppressed, heterosexuals are the oppressors. Islam is oppressed, Christianity is the oppressor. The Cultural Marxist utopia is one where true is relative, morals are irrelevant, drugs are plentiful and sex is commitment free, everyone is free to do as they please for we are all paid equally by the state.

Cultural Marxism has always aimed to take away the middle class. Marxists know that the middle classes were the reason their wars have failed. Trump represents the middle class.

And with so many Catholics tied up in sexual abuse, it is not surprise that their Academia are fighting for sexual freedoms!

So while Peter Lineham attributes the loss of religion to outside forces, I contend that it is predominantly forces inside the church that are turning people away. Lineham notes that people are still searching for spirituality. They are just not finding God at a Church any more. When people head to church, this Cultural Marxist teaching, based on Enlightenment history and Biblical studies, is often what they are presented with. This is why the church is in decline. God is not there. Academia has stolen him away.