Christians: Trans is never OK

Trans is never OK

Christians, being “trans” is never OK. Transsexuals are not “OK” with God. Claiming anyone can change gender is not OK with God. Not even in the privacy of one’s own home. And anyone saying they support those who claim they or anyone can change their gender is never “OK” with God.

Trans is never OK

This seems a strange thing to say to those who claim their religion is “Bible based”, but it still needs to be said. I can’t think of anything worse than hearing a preacher or Christian politician say “I don’t mind what you do in your own home” so they are liked more by their audience, or need the money or votes. Or maybe because they just don’t care.

But seriously, it’s not OK with God for people to claim that others can change their sexual identity, and especially not through surgery or drugs.

I can’t think of any preachers or wannabe politicians who claim “rape is OK as long as it’s done in private,” or “child abuse is OK  as long as it’s done in private”.

And yet many Christians seem to make the statement that being trans (or any other sexual deviancy, sodomy, etc) is “OK as long as it’s done in private/their own home/ bedroom”.

Being trans isn’t OK with Jesus!

Most I’ve met, or have  worked or lived with, have been abused, groomed, rejected or neglected . Those things are never OK and shouldn’t be what someone forms an identity around.

Christians should instead be seeking to deal with the issues that underlie the self hatred:

Abuse: verbal, physical or sexual is never OK
Grooming or indoctrination by parents, predators or teachers is never OK.
Rejection hurts, but shouldn’t lead to self hatred.
Neglect or abandonment shouldn’t lead to self hatred either.

And often it’s a combination of issues, so Christians; being trans is never OK.

When they’re screaming out telling you their new gender, it’s a sign of the hurt underneath.

Christians should be helping their recovery from the above underlying issues, not telling these people that the cause of their distress is that they’re in the wrong body, or that their deviant behaviour is OK, just as long as they hide it from us.

God made us in his own image, male and female,. God knew us before we were born, and we were created to be holy, sacred, to be partakers of his own divine nature.  And it’s never too late to start that journey.

LGBT’s majority of young sex offenders.

LGBT's majority of young sex offenders.

Sadly, all those homosexual men who have been abusing kids from the safety of their parishes are winning the culture war. This site is dedicated to a GLBT who vehemently objected to a child sex offenders register here in NZ.

LGBT's majority of young sex offenders.

This from www.advocate.com

It’s hard to believe that until recently, there were still laws on the books that made it illegal to be gay. Our legal system may no longer explicitly prohibit same-sex relationships, but we have found new ways to criminalize queer kids. We label them as sex offenders.

Across the country, children are put on sex-offense registries for behaviors that range from “playing doctor” to streaking to having consensual sex with peers a few years apart in age. The statistics are scary: out of 800,000 people on registries, one out of four — more than 200,000 — are under the age of 18. A child as young as 8 years old can be labeled as a “deviant.” Additionally, initial investigations show a disproportionate number of these youth are queer.

To be clear, kids do commit serious harm. Regardless of the behavior, though, two decades of research have shown that registration does not reduce recidivism or prevent harm in the first place. And the LGBTQ disparity isn’t a reflection of justice — or public safety. It’s an indication of the implicit and explicit bias woven throughout the legal and welfare systems and all the more reason to make eliminating the practice of registering youth a priority.

A report, called “Give the Kid a Break — But Only if He’s Straight,” found that LGBTQ young people are given harsher punishments than their straight, gender-conforming counterparts. In the study, participants suggested disciplinary consequences for an older teenager having sex with a 14-year-old. A 16-year-old straight culprit was much less likely to end up on the registry than a gay 16-year-old.

Queer and gender-nonconforming youth are also more likely to get kicked out of their homes, run away, or be funneled into the child welfare system. Once in the welfare system, their lives are more closely watched and normative behavior that might have elicited a talking to from parents ends up reported to authorities. Nicole Pittman’s human rights report, “Raised on the Registry,” found that 90 percent of the 500 youth on the registry she interviewed were in the child welfare system at the time of their arrest.

Even the laws themselves can be blatantly discriminatory. In the 2003 case Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court struck down state bans on same-sex sodomy; however, Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion included this single negating phrase: “[the] present case does not involve minors, which this comment will refer to as “the minor exception.'” Kennedy was referring to adult-on-minor sexual conduct, but states have used it as a loophole. Texas law, for example, considers sexual contact with a minor under the age of 17 a felony, unless both participants are under 18, no more than three years apart, and they are of different sexes.

Once young people are on the registry, the trauma grows. Children are ostracized, socially isolated, and often physically banished from their homes and communities by child safety zones. Their life becomes a struggle for employment, and they must regularly check in with law enforcement; if they fail to report even a minor change in their lives, they can be sent to prison with a felony. LGBTQ youth in prison can also be both the targets of sexual abuse and homophobia. One out of five youth on the registry have attempted suicide. Queer youth already have high rates of suicide, so this adds to the risk.

The laws created to protect our children from harm have potential to be very harmful, potentially fatal, and definitely life-altering. Registering youth is contrary to public safety and a costly burden to law enforcement, but it is our LGBTQ youth who are paying the high prices. While they have shown great resilience and courage, this debt is not theirs to pay. As a society, we need to redress this miscalculation and eliminate youth registration laws.

(wr by: TOM WAHL is chairman of the Liberty Education Forum and NICOLE PITTMAN is vice president of Impact Justice.)

Here’s why feminists can’t fix their rainbow.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

Considering it was NZ’s academic feminism that birthed our nations political, corporate, and social acceptance of these rainbow babies, it’s not surprising these same feminists now want to dis-own or abort their own child.  Aborting children is now solidly part of NZ’s feminist-led culture! These are the women that spent decades trying to get girls into boy scouts, boy schools and boys spaces.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

The old style feminists were out in force supporting Auckland trans movement. The grey haired woman in pink sleeveless top with the rainbow earrings was bashing a gong to help create the violence. This is a screenshot from in the video below. You see many more in the video below in their rainbow gear.

Feminists claim men have all power.  Men are toxic. Feminists want equality (equality means to replace men as being in control of society). Feminists still want total unrestrained freedom to be and do and experience whatever they please. First wave, second wave, third wave, fourth wave feminism. But they needed allies. They knew not all women wanted what they wanted, and they knew they couldn’t get what they wanted without getting men on their side.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

Another old style feminists with a gong celebrating her mehem with the trans who liked to show his knickers to everyone.

As part of sex-ed, from Age 5 children in NZ schools are encouraged to:  challenge homophobia, transphobia, sexism, and gender-based violence, interrogate the ongoing effects of colonisation, study the environmental impacts of changes in population growth and of related issues such as people’s use and disposal of menstrual products, … and gain understandings about the strengths of sexual and gender diversity.

Essentially, here in NZ, children are sexualised as soon as they get to school .

Auckland won't let women speak

Not all women are feminists. While not all feminists will admit to hating men themselves, they identify with the power and authority that being a feminist gives them over other women. They hate the society they claim men have created. So here’s why feminists can’t fix their rainbow.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

Gay men called in by the pride community leaders were out with their whistles, supported by the old style feminists with gongs in the back ground.

But firstly, we do need to acknowledge that glbt men are being beaten up in bathrooms for just being themselves. This is what they are afraid of. they are afraid of getting beaten up in mens bathrooms. There can be less of this if they don’t try and hit on straight guys when they go into the toilets. Also stop offering to pay for sex in public toilets. Stop asking actual men questions to try and ‘break the ice’ before you ask for sex. Stop complimenting men on their    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  or _ _ _ _ _ _  .  Stop touching straight men in bathrooms. That touch on the arm that women do, don’t do it. And don’t fish for compliments from straight men. You’re not beautiful, you look like a circus clown. We don’t like the way you look.

While all of the above behaviour glbt men claim may be ‘being yourselves’, and since so much of the violence is trans on trans, maybe stop trying to pick up anyone in public toilets. All these simple things will keep glbts safer in men’s spaces.

Feminist psychoticism was on full display!

feminists can't fix their rainbow

And secondly, we need to acknowledge that we understand where the anger comes from. The trans’s have been lied to, putting on a dress and make up doesn’t make anyone a woman. Having surgeries and and taking medications so now you can no longer give pleasure to anyone of any sex without toys, and not being able to orgasm in any gender must be devastating. We totally understand that, and we’d be disappointed too if we’d thought turning a penis inside out would replicate an actual vagina, with all the fluids, aromas, heat, muscle movements etc.  We’d be angry. Very angry. At ourselves, and at society. So we understand where this anger comes from.

And that’ collective anger is what we witnessed here:

Who organised the Let Women Speak event?

This event was organised by old school feminist womens, lesbian and gay rights type Labour Party supporters. One women even told Sean Plunket she was a life time Labour party supporter. These are the 1960’s and 70’s university grads type women that have been in control of the institutions here in NZ for decades since.

A typical women who turned up to support Posie Parker would call themselves a supporters of the glbt community. But by multitudes of hundreds, the majority of women were against Posie Parker speaking.

A typical graduate of our education system is this New Zealand minister of parliament.

Study: ‘Transgender’ Youth at Highest Risk for Violent Radicalization

Study: Transvestites are more at risk of violence from their own

The reason why there has been no outrage from either media or parliament at these comments is because it is normal New Zealand education from primary school upwards.

With decades of hatred against men, from primary schools to universities to workplaces, these same women are now asking where their male support for standing up for women’s rights is! Our Prime Minister doesn’t even know what a woman is!

With 3 MP’s there, all with the same education, how could the result be any different?

Golriz ready to fight nazi's

Who organised the “counter protest”?

Auckland Pride (LGBT), Unite Union, Tamaki Antifa, Labour Party, Green Party, NZ Police.

Boycott unitefeminists can't fix their rainbow.

Unite Union, Tamaki Antifa, Labour Party and Green Party were the same groups counter protesting against free speech outside the town hall in 2018 when the Canadian speakers were banned from the town hall. They were able to control the media by claiming we were all nazi’s, and nothing was mentioned about the actual original issue we originally had: the government and media cover up of child sexual abuse.

feminists can't fix their rainbow

The feminists are asking “where were the men?”

Traditional men have been shut out of public square. They have been kicked out of homes by the family court. Many of today’s kids have not had fathers at home, women simply have more money and more independence without men around.  Traditional men would keep away from the man hating feminist lesbian organisers and any message they had. Men are sick of the conflict that feminists create.

Any time men speak out against the onslaught of feminism in the workplace or anywhere else, they are shut down and called woman haters. If men object to feminism, women say it means they hate women. Men tire from this, and to keep away from this conflict and dramas with women because they are always to blame.

Why do people what to change genders in these ways anyway?

Why do they hate their own gender? They’re taught to by our feminist driven education system and media claiming that men have all power, all evil comes from men, masculinity is toxic.  Men are toxic. Why do they want to change? They’re taught changing genders will solve their problems. So who’s teaching them these things?

And this bring us to why feminists can’t fix their rainbow offspring: Simply because New Zealand’s current glbt juggernaut is the their own creation from the women’s studies departments. They’ll never admit they were wrong about their claims in all the same educational and political and business circles they’ve taken authority over.

Some feminists will deny the creation of the academic man/male/patriarchy hating that NZ academia has become is their work at all,. Instead they will point to some rich wealthy foreigner for paying them to spread the toxic masculinity mantra for decades. Feminists have started damage control already this week trying to find the financial sources of those promoting the ‘trans’ movement.

After taking over the universities, the feminists aimed for the churches and took them over also. Once the feminists had control of churches they encouraged their trans allies in also. As a result, the Anglican church has gone from being 35% of the population in the 1960’s to just 6% of NZ in 2018.

It’s never occurred to these feminists that they didn’t have to accept the money offered to them to promote the agenda. It never occurred to them that they didn’t have to teach the kids to hate men.

But the success of the trans movement in gaining momentum was built on generations of young kids hearing the toxic masculinity chants in classrooms and media and in homes throughout the country.

This is so institutionalised, they win the national person of the year award.

And here is below (top right) celebrating after Posie Parker left the stage:

feminists can't fix their rainbow

What’s going to happen?

This will take a couple of decades to disappear once the universities take out the current anti-men aspect from the curriculum. It’s taken several generations to get this bad, and it will take several more to undo.

But women won’t want to give up their power in academia, it means they’re wrong, and no feminist will ever admit they were wrong.

Ironically, the women who have re-written men to be evil in NZ history are now having their own writing burnt by their rainbow spawn.

Feminists can’t fix their rainbow. Formerly the woman’s studies department, is now Gender Studies on the UoA website:

Bachelor of Arts – BA

Note: Gender Studies includes the following courses taught by other faculties: EDUC 714 Gender, Sexuality and Education; POPLHLTH 769 Interpersonal and Family Violence; PSYCH 319 Psychology and Gender; PSYCH 755 Gender, Power and Sexuality; SOCCHFAM 700 Domestic Violence: Challenges and Responses; SOCHLTH 756 Special Topic.

For descriptions of these courses and their availability, please consult Student Services Online.

Gender Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
GENDER 101 Gender: Global and Local Semester 1
GENDER 208 Thinking Gender Semester 1
GENDER 306 Making Waves: Gender and Change Semester 2
Classical Studies and Ancient History


Course Title Available in 2023
ANCIENT 216 Sex and Power in Greece and Rome Semester 2
ANCIENT 316 Sex and Power in Greece and Rome Semester 2
Anthropology


Course Title Available in 2023
ANTHRO 106 Global Sound Cultures: Musics, Places and People Semester 2
ANTHRO 357 Gender, Sexuality and Popular Music Semester 2
Asian Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
ASIAN 200 Asian Identities Semester 2
ASIAN 303 Asian Identities Semester 2
Criminology


Course Title Available in 2023
CRIM 303 Gender, Crime and Justice Semester 2
English


Course Title Available in 2023
ENGLISH 102 Great Books: Seduction and Betrayal Semester 2
Philosophy


Course Title Available in 2023
PHIL 225 Power, Critique and Emancipation Semester 1
PHIL 345 Power, Critique and Emancipation Semester 1
Politics and International Relations


Course Title Available in 2023
POLITICS 109 Foundations of Western Politics and Law Semester 2
Sociology


Course Title Available in 2023
SOCIOL 200 Theory and Society Semester 1
SOCIOL 207 Sociology of Gender and Families Semester 1
SOCIOL 315 Law, Inequality and the State Semester 2
SOCIOL 322 A Sociology of Relational Life Semester 2

Bachelor of Arts (Honours) – BA(Hons)

Note: Gender Studies includes the following courses taught by other faculties: EDUC 714 Gender, Sexuality and Education; POPLHLTH 769 Interpersonal and Family Violence; PSYCH 319 Psychology and Gender; PSYCH 755 Gender, Power and Sexuality; SOCCHFAM 700 Domestic Violence: Challenges and Responses; SOCHLTH 756 Special Topic.

For descriptions of these courses and their availability, please consult Student Services Online.

Gender Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
GENDER 700 Critical Theories and Methods in Gender Studies Semester 1
GENDER 701/701AB Special Study Semester 1, or Semester 2, or Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
GENDER 780/780AB Research Project Semester 1, or Semester 2, or Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
GENDER 785/785A Dissertation Semester 1, or Semester 2, or Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Development Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
DEVELOP 702 Gender and Development Semester 1
History


Course Title Available in 2023
HISTORY 706AB Topics in European Cultural History Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Sociology


Course Title Available in 2023
SOCIOL 735 Current Debates in Gender and Sexuality Semester 2

Master of Arts – MA

Note: Gender Studies includes the following courses taught by other faculties: EDUC 714 Gender, Sexuality and Education; POPLHLTH 769 Interpersonal and Family Violence; PSYCH 319 Psychology and Gender; PSYCH 755 Gender, Power and Sexuality; SOCCHFAM 700 Domestic Violence: Challenges and Responses; SOCHLTH 756 Special Topic.

For descriptions of these courses and their availability, please consult Student Services Online.

Gender Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
GENDER 793 Dissertation Semester 1
GENDER 797AAB Research Portfolio Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Development Studies


Course Title Available in 2023
DEVELOP 702 Gender and Development Semester 1
History


Course Title Available in 2023
HISTORY 706AB Topics in European Cultural History Semester 1 and 2 (full year)
Sociology


Course Title Available in 2023
SOCIOL 735 Current Debates in Gender and Sexuality Semester 2

Bachelor of Arts – BA

Gender Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
GENDER 202 Gender in the Pacific Not taught in 2023
GENDER 206 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 207 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 300 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 301 Gender, Sex and Commodification Not taught in 2023
GENDER 307 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
Anthropology


Course Title Not taught 2023
ANTHRO 241 Anthropology of the Body Not taught in 2023
ANTHRO 354 Anthropology of the Body Not taught in 2023
ANTHRO 358 Gender and Colonialism in the Pacific Not taught in 2023
Art History


Course Title Not taught 2023
ARTHIST 233 The Art of Gender Politics Not taught in 2023
ARTHIST 333 The Art of Gender Politics Not taught in 2023
Communication


Course Title Not taught 2023
COMMS 304 Gender, Politics and the Media Not taught in 2023
Comparative Literature


Course Title Not taught 2023
COMPLIT 202 Interpreting Folktales Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
COMPLIT 303 Interpreting Folktales Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
English


Course Title Not taught 2023
ENGLISH 346 African and Caribbean Literature Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 354 Writing Selves Not taught in 2023
German


Course Title Not taught 2023
GERMAN 230 German Cinema from Murnau to Riefenstahl Not taught in 2023
History


Course Title Not taught 2023
HISTORY 241 Making Sense of the Sixties: the USA 1954-1974 Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 256 Sex and Gender in the Middle Millennium (500-1500CE) Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 326 Sex and Gender in the Middle Millennium (500-1500CE) Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 341 Making Sense of the Sixties: the USA 1954-1974 Not taught in 2023
Italian


Course Title Not taught 2023
ITALIAN 203 Engendered Voices (Texts in English) Not taught in 2023
Pacific Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
PACIFIC 208 Gender and the Pacific in a Globalising World Not taught in 2023
PACIFIC 307 Gender and the Pacific in a Globalising World Not taught in 2023
Sociology


Course Title Not taught 2023
SOCIOL 326 Sociology of Violence and Death Not taught in 2023
Theological and Religious Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
THEOREL 211 Religion, Gender and Sexuality Not taught in 2023
THEOREL 311 Religion, Gender and Sexuality Not taught in 2023

Bachelor of Arts (Honours) – BA(Hons)

Gender Studies


Course Title Not taught 2023
GENDER 705 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
GENDER 706 Special Topic Not taught in 2023
Drama


Course Title Not taught 2023
DRAMA 708 Drama and the Mind Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
English


Course Title Not taught 2023
ENGLISH 702 Postcolonial Literary Studies Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 709 Theatre on Screen Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 731 Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte Not taught in 2023
French


Course Title Not taught 2023
FRENCH 729 Gender and Culture: Perspectives from the French-speaking World Not taught in 2023
History


Course Title Not taught 2023
HISTORY 707AB Early Modern Japanese Lives Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 725AB Health, Medicine and Society Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
HISTORY 736AB Medieval Women, c.1100-1500 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Media and Communication


Course Title Not taught 2023
MEDIA 711 Feminist Film Theory Not taught in 2023
Philosophy


Course Title Not taught 2023
PHIL 740 Metaphysics 1 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Politics and International Relations


Course Title Not taught 2023
POLITICS 724 Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism Not taught in 2023
Sociology


Course Title Not taught 2023
SOCIOL 700 Advanced Problems in Sociological Theory Not taught in 2023
SOCIOL 728 Family, Gender and the State Not taught in 2023
Spanish


Course Title Not taught 2023
SPANISH 722 Gender Perspectives in Hispanic Literature Not taught in 2023
SPANISH 738 Engendering Nations Not taught in 2023

Master of Arts – MA

Drama


Course Title Not taught 2023
DRAMA 708 Drama and the Mind Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
English


Course Title Not taught 2023
ENGLISH 702 Postcolonial Literary Studies Not taught in 2023
ENGLISH 731 Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte Not taught in 2023
French


Course Title Not taught 2023
FRENCH 729 Gender and Culture: Perspectives from the French-speaking World Not taught in 2023
History


Course Title Not taught 2023
HISTORY 707AB Early Modern Japanese Lives Not taught in 2023
HISTORY 725AB Health, Medicine and Society Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
HISTORY 736AB Medieval Women, c.1100-1500 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Media and Communication


Course Title Not taught 2023
MEDIA 711 Feminist Film Theory Not taught in 2023
Philosophy


Course Title Not taught 2023
PHIL 740 Metaphysics 1 Not offered in 2023; planned for 2024
Politics and International Relations


Course Title Not taught 2023
POLITICS 707 Politics of Global Protest: Dissent, Resistance and Power Not taught in 2023
POLITICS 724 Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism Not taught in 2023
Sociology


Course Title Not taught 2023
SOCIOL 700 Advanced Problems in Sociological Theory Not taught in 2023
SOCIOL 728 Family, Gender and the State Not taught in 2023
Spanish


Course Title Not taught 2023
SPANISH 722 Gender Perspectives in Hispanic Literature Not taught in 2023
SPANISH 738 Engendering Nations Not taught in 2023

Auckland won’t Let Women Speak

Auckland won't Let Women Speak phuc

It’s official: The feminists have won. For decades feminist academics and feminist religious leaders have pushed for the creation and acceptance of the trans community here in NZ. Now, with the help of the trade unions (eg UNITE, who were out in force with flags and their vans) Auckland won’t Let Women Speak.

That wasn’t trans free speech, that was trans free violence, only only a medicated person cannot tell the difference.

But there is a reason why trans are upset. Lupron is the drug we prescribe children from 9 years old here in New Zealand as a ‘puberty blocker.’ It is also used across the world to chemically castrate SEX offenders. Do parents have any idea what they are actually giving their child? Lupron has been through huge lawsuits over the last decade. Your ‘trans’ child has an 80% chance of growing out of their gender dysmorphia by 18. They often end up simply being Lesbian or Gay. Rather than letting your child develop into these choices you are chemically castrating them so as adults they will never experience pleasure. This is beyond sickening and my heart breaks for the children who are being indoctrinated into choices they cannot possibly understand. Adults – do whatever you like. But we need to stop accepting the castration of children.

Auckland won't let women speak
*his underwear – that man wants to share a bathroom with your little girl.

The trans man in pink above was the one who threw tomato sauce/soup on Posie Parker.

The security footage of Posie Parker shows she had something held at her neck, possibly scissors or a phone gimble.

This is what all those women preaching have been wanting – for trans to have their own voice in this world. Well, the trans voice says women cannot have their own spaces!

The feminists have won. Feminists claim men should no longer be heard, and they wanted equality. This is what they have worked for. The trans community in Auckland won’t Let Women Speak

Perhaps even more worrying were the number of men wanting men to have access to women’s toilets!

Auckland won't Let Women Speak phuc

Today’s violence against women was officially sanction by the NZ Government whose members of Parliament were there to supervise:

Marama Davidson NZ Member of Parliament – minister of prevention of violence was present today, and sanctioned the violence against women because it’s men’s fault. This is part of the reason why so many Maori men are in jail – because their women cannot simply think straight.

Other NZ politicians were ready for physical confrontation today, yet they support the nazi’s in Ukraine? Only feminist logic understand that!

Golriz ready to fight nazi's

New Zealand police were never going to help biological women in a space like this.

This from the Daily Telegraph:

Posie Parker – ‘All we’re saying to men is stay out of our spaces’

Women’s Rights activist Posie Parker is due to open the New Zealand leg of her world tour today, with an event in Albert Park Auckland this morning at 10.30am.

In a YouTube video she explained how a number of companies had cancelled their services at the last minute, at huge additional cost to her – sound system and security were two examples. ‘You have to find someone at the last minute, they understand your desperation and the prices go up.’

The security alone was going to cost $10,000, she said. ‘A company in Wellington refused, just won’t protect us. And this is because we’ve been really badly defamed and most people really hate women. But ten thousand is just ridiculous right?’

‘We know what biological sex is. We know what risks men pose to us. We know what their motivations are more often than not. Other men know their motivations. And unless you hate women and couldn’t care less about the safety of children, I don’t really understand how you can go along with this cult.’

‘They just prove our point. Every time they come on my thread or follow me on Twitter, or say something on Twitter like ‘go home’, ‘shut up’, ‘stay silent’, ‘f** off’, they just prove our point. Because we’re not saying that. All we’re saying to men is ‘stay out of our spaces.’

auckland won't let women speak

Auckland won't Let Women Speak

Auckland won't Let Women Speak

Today’s protest was organised by UNITE trade union, who had their team and van on site, then moved down to turn the family values march to a trans issue.
Boycott Unite Union businesses, women are not safe in their toilets! It is staff members from these businesses who created a living hell and are celebrating today.

Boycott unite

 Boycott unite

Women are not safe is these company toilets!

If biological women boycotted these businesses, the trans movement  in NZ would be zero.

love has no genders Auckland won't let women speak

Former Catholic Bishop of Auckland questioned over recommending priest facing abuse allegations

Former Catholic Bishop of Auckland questioned over recommending priest facing abuse allegations

Former Catholic Bishop of Auckland questioned over recommending priest facing abuse allegations

The former Catholic Bishop of Auckland has come under intense questioning at the abuse in care inquiry over recommending a priest, who had three allegations of abuse made against him, for a teaching job.

The Catholic Church appeared at the Royal Commission hearing in Auckland on Monday.

Bishop Patrick Dunn was responding to complaints made about Tongan priest Sateki Raass.

Raass was convicted in March 2019 for assaulting a person under 16, and he was sentenced to do 100 hours of community service. He later resigned from the priesthood.

He was a priest under the control of the Bishop of Tonga but was working in the Auckland Diocese.

Bishop Dunn was asked by counsel for the inquiry Katherine Anderson why he recommended Raass for a school teaching job nearly two years after he had been convicted.

“The principal [of the school] was also aware of the situation and felt it would not be a problem,” Bishop Dunn said.

The teaching position did not eventuate.

Bishop Dunn said in hindsight, Raass holding a teaching position would have been unwise.

“In some ways, yes, but on the other hand, he is a pretty talented man and comes from a family of teachers.”

Anderson asked the bishop if he understood his views might be seen as unrelenting support for Raass.
‘’You know you have had personal knowledge of three reports of abuse and you have been aware, at least in 2013, that he had been suspended in Tonga. It is a very strong sense of a commitment you have got for this person,” Anderson said.

Bishop Dunn replied: ‘’It is not a strong sense of support for him per se, but all through my life I have tried to help people who have had convictions to get their life back on to an even keel.”

He did not think it was unwise, but that it might not have been the right time, he said.

Raass was sent to live at a presbytery near a Catholic school. The school chair wrote to Bishop Dunn asking why it had been allowed.

‘’The actual choice of Balmoral was made within hours, so he had to move somewhere,” Bishop Dunn said.

“The police had no objection to the move. Later, the bail conditions were changed. I don’t think the police ever saw Sateki Raass as a threat to primary school children.’’

Bishop Dunn said he was kept at arm’s length from the complaints, as it was investigated by the church’s professional standards committee.

“So the complaint went to them and I was always kept at a distance from the actual complaint, so I was not an investigator as it were.”

The Archbishop of Wellington, Cardinal John Dew, spoke to the Royal Commission last year and he was back on Monday.

He reiterated the apology given on behalf of the Catholic Church in March 2021.

“Abuse is wrong, it should never be part of the church. I, and all of us, are ashamed on it. We are working hard to put safeguarding practices in place and we will continue to work on that.

“We will continue to work on what we have discovered during the time of this royal commission.”

The mission of the Catholic Church today was to build a safe church, Cardinal Dew said.

Dr Paul Flanagan, a lay member of the Catholic Church’s National Safeguarding and Professional Standards Committee, told the inquiry that abuse of trust was never acceptable.

“Such an abuse of trust in Catholic faith communities is shameful. It is shameful that people in authority who may have known about the abuse did not act in the victims’ favour.

“Whether bishops, priests, brothers, sisters, even parents, the level of abuse that we know of is painful to us all, so we need to support those who come forward to disclose abuse done to them and support them through which ever process they prefer.”
nzherald.co.nz